Brown v. Weathers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Brown v. Weathers

136 S.E. 892, 163 Ga. 835, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 74

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 24, 1927

DocketNo. 5581

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 892 (Brown v. Weathers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Weathers, 136 S.E. 892, 163 Ga. 835, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 74 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This case came before a full bench of six Justices, the question being whether the judgment of the superior court refusing to grant a mandamus absolute was error. On that question the Justices are equally divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Gilbert, J., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Atkinson, Hill, and Hines, JJ., being of the contrary opinion; and the judgment of the trial court stands affirmed by operation of law. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This case came before a full bench of six Justices, the question being whether the judgment of the superior court refusing to grant a mandamus absolute was error. On that question the Justices are equally divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Gilbert, J., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Atkinson, Hill, and Hines, JJ., being of the contrary opinion; and the judgment of the trial court stands affirmed by operation of law. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 892, 163 Ga. 835, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-weathers-ga-1927.