Brown v. Weathers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Brown v. Weathers

136 S.E. 892, 163 Ga. 835, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 74

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 24, 1927·No. No. 5581·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This case came before a full bench of six Justices, the question being whether the judgment of the superior court refusing to grant a mandamus absolute was error. On that question the Justices are equally divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Gilbert, J., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Atkinson, Hill, and Hines, JJ., being of the contrary opinion; and the judgment of the trial court stands affirmed by operation of law. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This case came before a full bench of six Justices, the question being whether the judgment of the superior court refusing to grant a mandamus absolute was error. On that question the Justices are equally divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Gilbert, J., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Atkinson, Hill, and Hines, JJ., being of the contrary opinion; and the judgment of the trial court stands affirmed by operation of law. Judgment affirmed.

Brown v. Weathers, 136 S.E. 892, 163 Ga. 835, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 74 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

136 S.E. 892 (Brown v. Weathers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.