Brown v. Washington

110 Mass. 529
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

1. The officer made a palpable mistake in his return, by writing the name of Devereux Dennis, the creditor, instead of Samuel D. Tilton, the appraiser, in his recital of the administration of the oath to the appraisers; and the means of correcting it may be found in his return. The error is therefore amendable.

2. The fact that the officer chose his brother-in-law as an appraiser does not vitiate the levy,- for neither the officer nor the appraiser had any interest in the land or its value.

Judgment for the tenant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Washington, 110 Mass. 529 (Mass. 1872).

110 Mass. 529 (Brown v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marble v. Bloom
150 N.E. 831 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)