Brown v. Warram

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Brown v. Warram

3 H. & J. 572

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 15, 1815

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 3 H. & J. 572 (Brown v. Warram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Warram, 3 H. & J. 572 (Md. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

Johnson, J.

The defendant could not, to defeat the action on the general issue, rely on the note being joint, but if he intended to avail himself of that circumstance he ought to have pleaded it in abatement. For the note being joint did not prove that the defendant had not assumed, and assumed, although another also assumed;-there was no variance of course between the allegata and probata.

JUSGMENT REVERSE», &üj

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson, J.

The defendant could not, to defeat the action on the general issue, rely on the note being joint, but if he intended to avail himself of that circumstance he ought to have pleaded it in abatement. For the note being joint did not prove that the defendant had not assumed, and assumed, although another also assumed;-there was no variance of course between the allegata and probata.

JUSGMENT REVERSE», &üj

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 H. & J. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-warram-md-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack