Brown v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.

309 S.W.3d 350, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 240, 2010 WL 711625
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 2, 2010
DocketED 92978
StatusPublished

This text of 309 S.W.3d 350 (Brown v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., 309 S.W.3d 350, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 240, 2010 WL 711625 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Laura Brown, appeals from the Decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits and affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security (the Division), with one member dissenting, that claimant left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work or her employer. The Decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the Decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Buford
309 S.W.3d 350 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 S.W.3d 350, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 240, 2010 WL 711625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-wal-mart-associates-inc-moctapp-2010.