Brown v. United States
476 U.S. 1157, 106 S. Ct. 2275
Opinion
C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari is granted limited to the following question: “In cases pending on direct appeal, should the holding in Batson v. Kentucky, ante, p. 79, be given retroactive effect?” Case is set [1158]*1158for oral argument in tandem with No. 85-5221, Griffith v. Kentucky, immediately supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. United States, 476 U.S. 1157, 106 S. Ct. 2275 (1986).
476 U.S. 1157 (Brown v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tinsley v. State
507 So. 2d 1004 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
California v. Brown
479 U.S. 538 (Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Pierre
501 So. 2d 906 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
United States v. Cox
23 M.J. 808 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1986)
United States v. Bobby Roy Dennis, Sr., Sharon Denise Cohen, Clarence Bobby Jennings, Brenda Jewell Hurley
804 F.2d 1208 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Lowden David
803 F.2d 1567 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
People v. Johnson
504 N.E.2d 502 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1986)
United States v. Ralph H. Washington
797 F.2d 1461 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
United States Ex Rel. Kyles v. O'LEARY
642 F. Supp. 222 (N.D. Illinois, 1986)
Diaz v. Scully
641 F. Supp. 1037 (S.D. New York, 1986)