Brown v. United States District Courts

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. United States District Courts

516 F. App'x 273

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 1, 2013

DocketNo. 12-2551

StatusPublished

This text of 516 F. App'x 273 (Brown v. United States District Courts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. United States District Courts, 516 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. U.S. District Courts, No. 1:12-cv-03485-ELH (D.Md. filed Dec. 3, 2012; entered Dec. 7, 2012). We grant Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis but deny his motion to seal the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. U.S. District Courts, No. 1:12-cv-03485-ELH (D.Md. filed Dec. 3, 2012; entered Dec. 7, 2012). We grant Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis but deny his motion to seal the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

516 F. App'x 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-united-states-district-courts-ca4-2013.