Brown v. United States
This text of Brown v. United States (Brown v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 26-1179 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 03/23/2026
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ANTONIO LETRELL BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2026-1179 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:25-cv-00737-LAS, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. ______________________
PER CURIAM. ORDER On August 25, 2025, the United States Court of Federal Claims entered judgment dismissing Antonio Letrell Brown’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Mr. Brown’s notice of appeal was received by the Court of Federal Claims on November 14, 2025. This court directed the parties to show cause whether the appeal should be dis- missed as untimely. The United States urges dismissal. Mr. Brown did not respond to the court’s show cause order. We now dismiss. Case: 26-1179 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 03/23/2026
To be timely, a notice of appeal must typically be re- ceived by the Court of Federal Claims within 60 days of the entry of the final judgment. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2107(b), 2522; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C). This stat- utory deadline is mandatory and jurisdictional, such that we may not excuse a late notice. Marandola v. United States, 518 F.3d 913, 914 (Fed. Cir. 2008); see also Hender- son v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 438–39 (2011); cf. Fed. R. App. P. 26(b)(1). Because the notice of appeal was not re- ceived within that time, we lack jurisdiction and must dis- miss.1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT
March 23, 2026 Date
1 Although it appears Mr. Brown was incarcerated at the time he filed his notice, he has not submitted any declaration or evidence establishing that he deposited his notice of appeal in the institution’s mail system with first- class postage prepaid on or before the last day for filing. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-united-states-cafc-2026.