Brown v. United States

368 F.2d 841
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 21, 1966·No. No. 23810·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant has appealed from the denial of a motion for the correction of sentence pursuant to Rule 35, Federal Rules Crim.Proc., 18 U.S.C.A. After waiver of counsel, appellant entered a plea of guilty to all three counts of an indictment. Each count carried a maximum penalty of five years. The district court imposed a general sentence of six years. The contention is that the sentence is illegal under Benson v. United States, 5th Cir. 1964, 332 F.2d 288. The sentence was imposed prior to the decisión in the Benson case. The question is whether Benson should be given retrospective effect. It is our conclusion that retrospective effect is not required either by the Constitution of the United States or by anything said in the Benson opinion. See Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott, 382 U.S. 406, 86 S.Ct. 459, 15 L.Ed.2d 453, 456-461 (1966). The order of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. United States, 368 F.2d 841 (5th Cir. 1966).

368 F.2d 841 (Brown v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Charles T. Maude
481 F.2d 1062 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
U.S. V Morgan
456 F.2d 800 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
United States ex rel. Mayfield v. Pate
451 F.2d 1381 (Seventh Circuit, 1971)
Duran Jones v. United States
381 F.2d 351 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)