Brown v. Two Exch. Plaza Partners
74 N.Y.2d 915
This text of 74 N.Y.2d 915 (Brown v. Two Exch. Plaza Partners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brown v. Two Exch. Plaza Partners, 74 N.Y.2d 915 (N.Y. 1989).
Opinion
Paul Brown et al., Respondents,
v.
Two Exchange Plaza Partners, Defendant, and George A. Fuller Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Heydt Contracting Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents; A & M Wallboard Co., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Heydt Contracting Corporation, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Walter F. Ulma, Inc., et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Motion for leave to appeal granted. Motion for a stay *916 granted. Motion to strike so much of the submissions of Central Furring and Dry Wall Company as seeks dismissal denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brown v. Two Exhange Plaza Partners
549 N.E.2d 149 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 N.Y.2d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-two-exch-plaza-partners-ny-1989.