Brown v. Travelodge of Oregon, Inc.
625 P.2d 685, 51 Or. App. 475, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2614
Opinion
Plaintiffs, lessors, appeal an order dismissing their complaint in a forcible entry and detainer action. They make three assignments of error, none of which complies with Rule 25.10, Rules of Appellate Procedure. We decline to review the merits of the assignments of error. See Castor v. Erlandson, 277 Or 147, 560 P2d 267 (1977); Barbour v. Peck, 44 Or App 363, 606 P2d 628 (1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Travelodge of Oregon, Inc., 625 P.2d 685, 51 Or. App. 475, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2614 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
625 P.2d 685 (Brown v. Travelodge of Oregon, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Castor v. Erlandson
560 P.2d 267 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1977)
Barbour v. Peck
606 P.2d 628 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)