Brown v. Travelodge of Oregon, Inc.

625 P.2d 685, 51 Or. App. 475, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2614
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 30, 1981
DocketNo. 80-391L, CA 18420
StatusPublished

This text of 625 P.2d 685 (Brown v. Travelodge of Oregon, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Travelodge of Oregon, Inc., 625 P.2d 685, 51 Or. App. 475, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2614 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, lessors, appeal an order dismissing their complaint in a forcible entry and detainer action. They make three assignments of error, none of which complies with Rule 25.10, Rules of Appellate Procedure. We decline to review the merits of the assignments of error. See Castor v. Erlandson, 277 Or 147, 560 P2d 267 (1977); Barbour v. Peck, 44 Or App 363, 606 P2d 628 (1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castor v. Erlandson
560 P.2d 267 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1977)
Barbour v. Peck
606 P.2d 628 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 P.2d 685, 51 Or. App. 475, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-travelodge-of-oregon-inc-orctapp-1981.