Brown v. Town of Social Circle

32 S.E. 141, 105 Ga. 834, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 731
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1898·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. The Town of Social Circle has authority, under the general welfare clause in its charter, to pass and enforce an ordinance prohibiting the keeping for unlawful sale, within the limits of the town, of any alcholic, malt, or other intoxicating liquors. Paulk v. Sycamore, 104 Ga. 728, and cases cited.

2. The ground of the certiorari which complained of the refusal to grant a continuance was without merit. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the judgment, and there was no error in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Simmons, O. J., and Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Town of Social Circle, 32 S.E. 141, 105 Ga. 834, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 731 (Ga. 1898).

32 S.E. 141 (Brown v. Town of Social Circle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaver v. Martin
143 S.E. 402 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Thomas v. City of Atlanta
84 S.E. 964 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Callaway v. Mims
62 S.E. 654 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Hood v. Mayor of Griffin
38 S.E. 409 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Kassell v. Mayor of Savannah
35 S.E. 147 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Henderson v. Heyward
47 L.R.A. 366 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Cunningham v. City of Griffin
33 S.E. 664 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)