Brown v. Top Guard

630 F. App'x 201
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2054
StatusPublished

This text of 630 F. App'x 201 (Brown v. Top Guard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Top Guard, 630 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christie G. Brown appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her employment discrimination claim and denying [202]*202her motion to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Top Guard, No. 2:14-cv-00470-MSD-LRL (E.D.Va. May 29, 2015; Aug. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 F. App'x 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-top-guard-ca4-2016.