BROWN v. the STATE.
This text of 814 S.E.2d 738 (BROWN v. the STATE.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
McMillian, Judge. On March 13, 2013, appellant Johnny M. Brown entered a negotiated guilty plea to five counts of child molestation. The trial court sentenced Brown to ten years to serve on Count 1 and probation on the remaining counts, for a total sentence of forty years, with the first ten years to be served in confinement and the remainder to be served on probation. On September 21, 2017, Brown filed a motion to correct void sentence based on the trial court's alleged failure to follow the requirements of former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b) in sentencing him. 1 The trial court denied Brown's motion, and Brown filed this appeal. As more fully set forth below, we now vacate Brown's sentence and remand for resentencing.
Under the version of the statute in effect in 2013 when Brown was sentenced,
2
the trial court was required to sentence Brown to a "split-sentence" consisting of a minimum term of imprisonment, as specified in the Code section for the offense of child molestation, followed by an additional probated sentence of at least one year on
each offense.
Former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b) ;
State v. Riggs
,
Although Brown does not raise as error the probation only sentences for child molestation, 5 we also note that former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b) required that the sentence for any person convicted of a sexual offense include the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment specified in the code section for that offense and "no portion of the mandatory minimum sentence imposed shall be suspended, stayed, or probated ..." Former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b). As we explained above, there was no indication that the trial court entered written findings necessary to deviate from the mandatory minimum. Therefore, those sentences are void for this additional reason. Accordingly, we vacate Brown's sentence and remand to the trial court for entry of a new sentence on each count as required by former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b). 6
Sentence vacated and case remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
814 S.E.2d 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-the-state-gactapp-2018.