Brown v. Taliaferro

1933 OK 14, 18 P.2d 514, 161 Okla. 284, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 456
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 24, 1933·No. 22175·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

February 11, 1981, plaintiff filed his petition in the district court of Carter county, and on February 25th, was granted a temporary restraining order. On March 19; 1981, plaintiff ini error appealed to this court and filed his brief on August 5, 1931, and the authorities in that brief reasonably tend to support the assignments of error and allegations of error in the district court.

Two extensions of tíme have been granted defendant in, error; and he has failed to excuse the delay or failure to1 file brief herein. This court need not search the record to find some theory upon which to sustain the action1 of the trial court, hut may reverse and remand this case where the authorities cited as. above stated reasonably tend to sustain the assignments of error. ,

The case is reversed and remanded, with directions to grant the prayer of the petition in error and enter a permanent injunction as prayed for.

Note.—See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 176; R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 360.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Taliaferro, 1933 OK 14, 18 P.2d 514, 161 Okla. 284, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 456 (Okla. 1933).

1933 OK 14 (Brown v. Taliaferro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.