Brown v. Strickland

32 Me. 174
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 32 Me. 174 (Brown v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Strickland, 32 Me. 174 (Me. 1850).

Opinion

Wells, J.,

orally.—A demandant in a real action must prove his title. Under the will the title was vested in two persons, executors and trustees. Provision was made in the will for the appointment of a substitute, if one of them should die.

One of them died. Thereupon Mr. Appleton was appointed and qualified, and gave bond, not as a trustee, but as administrator de bonis non. In his commission, nothing is said in reference to rights or duties as a trustee. The offices and the requisite bonds are very distinct.

In administrators de bonis non. the title to the testator’s real estate does not vest. They can maintain no real actions. We think no title vested in Mr. Appleton, upon which to maintain this suit.

There are other questions of magnitude in this case, but it is unnecessary to discuss them. Demandants nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Champagne v. Fortin
402 A.2d 471 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1979)
Desmond v. Persina
381 A.2d 633 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)
Butts v. Fitzgerald
121 A.2d 364 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Me. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-strickland-me-1850.