Brown v. "Street Lighting District Number One"
This text of 58 A. 115 (Brown v. "Street Lighting District Number One") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The prosecutor sued out the writ in this case to set aside a contract awarded to the Carteret Electric 'Light and Power Company for lighting Woodbridge.
The prosecutor is a taxpayer and is a resident in said lighting district.
[80]*80Ephraim Cutter, one of the commissioners who awarded the contract to the Carteret company, is a stockholder in said company, and therefore the contract is without validity and should be set aside. Winans v. Crane, 7 Vroom 394; Traction Company v. Board of Works, 27 Id. 431; Foster v. Cape May, 31 Id. 78.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 A. 115, 71 N.J.L. 79, 42 Vroom 79, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-street-lighting-district-number-one-nj-1904.