Brown v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Brown v. State

243 N.W.2d 519, 73 Wis. 2d 351, 1976 Wisc. LEXIS 1148

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJune 30, 1976

DocketNo. 75-123-CR

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 243 N.W.2d 519 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 243 N.W.2d 519, 73 Wis. 2d 351, 1976 Wisc. LEXIS 1148 (Wis. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the judgment and order should be affirmed or reversed. Mr. Chief Justice Bruce F. Beilfuss, Mr. Justice Nathan S. Heffernan, and Mr. Justice Roland B. Day being of the opinion that the judgment and order should be reversed, and Mr. Justice Leo B. Hanley, Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment and order should be affirmed, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed under the rule.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the judgment and order should be affirmed or reversed. Mr. Chief Justice Bruce F. Beilfuss, Mr. Justice Nathan S. Heffernan, and Mr. Justice Roland B. Day being of the opinion that the judgment and order should be reversed, and Mr. Justice Leo B. Hanley, Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment and order should be affirmed, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed under the rule.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 N.W.2d 519, 73 Wis. 2d 351, 1976 Wisc. LEXIS 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-wis-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack