Brown v. State

128 S.W.2d 1176

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Tex. Crim. 3 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 31, 1939·No. No. 20444·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft. Punishment is assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be-in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft. Punishment is assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be-in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Brown v. State, 128 S.W.2d 1176 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

128 S.W.2d 1176 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.