Brown v. State

150 S.W. 906, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 729
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 Tex. Crim. 570
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 6, 1912·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of misdemeanor theft; his punishment being assessed at a fine of $10 and one day in the cofinty jail.

The record is before us without bills of exception or a motion for new trial. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and an inspection of the facts, we think, justified the finding of the court. We are not apprised what appellant’s contentions are, except from his brief. He contends that the alleged stolen property was taken with the consent of the owner; but the owner testifies the other way. We deem it unnecessary to review the facts. The court was justified in his finding, and we would not be authorized to set it aside under the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 150 S.W. 906, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 729 (Tex. 1912).

150 S.W. 906 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.