Brown v. State

13 Tex. Ct. App. 347, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 20, 1883
DocketNo. 1380
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Tex. Ct. App. 347 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. State, 13 Tex. Ct. App. 347, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9 (Tex. Ct. App. 1883).

Opinion

White, P. J.

In Williams v. The State, 12 Texas Ct. App., 395, and in repeated decisions since, it has been held that “the form for an indictment for theft prescribed by the Act of 1881, entitled ‘An Act to prescribe the forms of indictments in certain cases,’ charges no facts, acts, or omissions constituting the offense of theft, and is therefore repugnant to the Constitution of this State.”

This form is followed in the indictment before us; and under it appellant was tried and convicted for theft of two hundred and fifty dollars in money. Defendant’s counsel moved the court to quash the indictment, but the motion was overruled. In this the court erred. Because the indictment is fatally defective and charges no offense against the law, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Opinion rendered January 20, 1883.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Tex. Ct. App. 347, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-texapp-1883.