Brown v. State

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Brown v. State

DecidedOctober 31, 2011

DocketNo. KM-2000-323 (K1-1993-0598)

StatusPublished

This text of Brown v. State (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, (R.I. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

AMENDED DECISION This Amended Decision is being filed to correct the following:

The heading on the original Decision was as follows:

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENC PLANTATIONS SUPERIOR COURT KENT, SC.

The heading is being corrected to read as follows:

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS KENT, SC. SUPERIOR COURT

Also, the following paragraph is being amended to conform with the rest of the Decision: The appellant also filed a "Motion to Amend Parole Violation," alleging that "the Parole Board violated [his] U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1, 5, and 14, when denying parole because the Petitioner is challenging his illegal conviction in the court." (Def.'s Memo., filed December 2, 2010, at 1). Brown's original petition for post-conviction relief was assigned to this Court by then Presiding Justice Joseph F. Rodgers, Jr., on May 16, 2001. *Page 2

The new paragraph should read as follows:

The appellant also filed a "Motion to Amend Parole Violation," alleging that "the Parole Board violated [his] U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1, 5, and 14, when denying parole because the Petitioner is challenging his illegal conviction in the court." (Def.'s Memo., filed December 2, 2010, at 1.) Brown's original petition for post-conviction relief was assigned to this Court by then Presiding Justice Joseph F. Rodgers, Jr., on May 16, 2001.

The remaining contents of the Decision filed on October 28, 2011, remain the same.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMENDED DECISION This Amended Decision is being filed to correct the following:

The heading on the original Decision was as follows:

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENC PLANTATIONS SUPERIOR COURT KENT, SC.

The heading is being corrected to read as follows:

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS KENT, SC. SUPERIOR COURT

Also, the following paragraph is being amended to conform with the rest of the Decision: The appellant also filed a "Motion to Amend Parole Violation," alleging that "the Parole Board violated [his] U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1, 5, and 14, when denying parole because the Petitioner is challenging his illegal conviction in the court." (Def.'s Memo., filed December 2, 2010, at 1). Brown's original petition for post-conviction relief was assigned to this Court by then Presiding Justice Joseph F. Rodgers, Jr., on May 16, 2001. *Page 2

The new paragraph should read as follows:

The appellant also filed a "Motion to Amend Parole Violation," alleging that "the Parole Board violated [his] U.S. Constitutional Amendments 1, 5, and 14, when denying parole because the Petitioner is challenging his illegal conviction in the court." (Def.'s Memo., filed December 2, 2010, at 1.) Brown's original petition for post-conviction relief was assigned to this Court by then Presiding Justice Joseph F. Rodgers, Jr., on May 16, 2001.

The remaining contents of the Decision filed on October 28, 2011, remain the same.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Brown v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-risuperct-2011.