Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

544 S.W.3d 687

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 10, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105545

StatusPublished

This text of 544 S.W.3d 687 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 544 S.W.3d 687 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Evrick Brown ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order"¹ denying Movant's "Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence," which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An *688extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Evrick Brown ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order"¹ denying Movant's "Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence," which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An *688extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 S.W.3d 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-moctapp-2018.