Brown v. State

926 S.W.2d 151, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 950, 1996 WL 290577
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 894
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 1996·No. No. WD 51282·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lafayette L. Brown appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. Mr. Brown contends that his guilty plea was entered unknowingly, un-intelligently and involuntarily because counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate whether the state had sufficient information to support a conviction prior to entry of the plea.

[152]*152We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 84.16(b) but have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 926 S.W.2d 151, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 950, 1996 WL 290577 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

926 S.W.2d 151 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.