Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Brown v. State

145 S.E.2d 697, 112 Ga. App. 635, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 798

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1965

Docket41624

StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.E.2d 697 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 145 S.E.2d 697, 112 Ga. App. 635, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 798 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. The third enumeration of error of the appellant is controlled adversely to her by the decision in Headnote 1 of Brown v. State, ante.

2. The second enumeration of error of the appellant is controlled adversely to the State by the decision in Headnotes [636]*6363 and 4 in Brown v. State, supra, and for such reason the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

Submitted November 2, 1965 Decided November 10, 1965. Casey Thigpen, for appellant. Thomas A. Hutcheson, Solicitor, for appellee.

3. The remaining enumeration of error complains of the failure of the court to charge the principles of law necessarily involved in the case, and in support of such enumeration of error it is argued that the court did not charge the jury what would constitute a violation of the law by the defendant. While the charge given may have been subject to criticism it was not .subject to the enumeration of error relied upon by the defendant.

Case remanded for new trial.

Eberhardt and Pannell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI