Brown v. State
This text of 24 S.E.2d 67 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the offense of lottery, generally known as the “number game.” The corpus delicti was established by stipulation of counsel for both parties. In addition, the plenary confession that the defendant was a “writer,” an essential agency in the operation of the number game, together with evidence to the effect that he was in possession of a number of lottery tickets at the time when and the place where he was arrested, were sufficient to sustain a conviction. The judge did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 S.E.2d 67, 68 Ga. App. 733, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-gactapp-1943.