Brown v. State
This text of 100 S.E. 452 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The second ground of the amendment to the motion for new trial is not referred to in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, and will be treated as abandoned.
2. When read in connection with the entire charge, there is no error in any of the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made.
3. As far as legal and pertinent, the principle embraced in the request to charge was fully covered in the charge given. Besides, it does not appear that the request was made before the jury retired “to consider of their verdict.”
4. The evidence supports the verdict which.has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not disturb it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 S.E. 452, 24 Ga. App. 268, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-gactapp-1919.