Brown v. State
This text of 77 S.E. 922 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The charge of the trial judge was a full, fair, and accurate exposition of the law pertinent to the evidence in the case. There was no request for an instruction upon any theory exclusively dependent upon the defendant’s statement. None of the exceptions are meritorious; and though, under the evidence, the jury would have been authorized to return a verdict of assault and battery, the testimony justified the verdict returned. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 S.E. 922, 12 Ga. App. 642, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-gactapp-1913.