Brown v. State

77 S.E. 922, 12 Ga. App. 642, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 676
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 16, 1913
Docket4708
StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.E. 922 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. State, 77 S.E. 922, 12 Ga. App. 642, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 676 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Russell, J.

The charge of the trial judge was a full, fair, and accurate exposition of the law pertinent to the evidence in the case. There was no request for an instruction upon any theory exclusively dependent upon the defendant’s statement. None of the exceptions are meritorious; and though, under the evidence, the jury would have been authorized to return a verdict of assault and battery, the testimony justified the verdict returned. Judgment affirmed.

Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from'Dodge superior court—Judge Martin. December 31, 1913. Roberts & Smith, for plaintiff in error. W. A. Wooten, solicitor-general, confer

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 922, 12 Ga. App. 642, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-gactapp-1913.