Brown v. State

954 So. 2d 1177, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5282, 2007 WL 1062479
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 885 So. 2d 391
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 2007·No. No. 3D06-1342·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Orta v. State, 919 So.2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)(holding that any error in denying a defendant her or his right to be present at a critical stage or any proceeding is fundamental error, except in resentencing cases where only the “ministerial act” of sentence correction is required); Cook v. State, 481 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)(striking that portion [1178]*1178of the sentence that improperly retained jurisdiction and affirming all else).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 954 So. 2d 1177, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5282, 2007 WL 1062479 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

954 So. 2d 1177 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. State
481 So. 2d 1285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Orta v. State
919 So. 2d 602 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)