Brown v. State

903 So. 2d 251, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636, 2005 WL 1047267
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 2005·No. No. 5D04-631·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Thomas v. State, 838 So.2d 535 (Fla.2003) (stating that as long as a trial court’s findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, an appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact; likewise it will not substitute its judgment for the trial court’s on the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court); Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250 (Fla.1997).

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 903 So. 2d 251, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636, 2005 WL 1047267 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

903 So. 2d 251 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BISCAYNE INV. GROUP v. Guarantee Management
903 So. 2d 251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)