Brown v. State
This text of 847 So. 2d 1020 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Marvin BROWN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Marvin F. Clegg, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Marvin Brown appeals a written order revoking his community control. Although the trial court determined and pronounced orally that Brown violated only condition 17(c) of the terms of his community control, the written order listed violations of other conditions that the trial court determined had not been violated.
The trial court correctly revoked community control and imposed a sentence, but Brown is entitled to a correct revocation order that conforms to the oral pronouncements. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation and sentence, but vacate the written order indicating multiple violations and remand for the entry of a correct order.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED in part.
SHARP, W., PETERSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
847 So. 2d 1020, 2003 WL 2002604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.