Brown v. State

739 So. 2d 745, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12375, 1999 WL 741057
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 682 So. 2d 667
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1999·No. No. 98-0160·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his conviction for delivery of cocaine pursuant to sections [746]*746893.03(2)(a)4. and 893.12(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), on the ground that the trial court erred by leaving the courtroom during voir dire of prospective jurors. The State concedes error, and we reverse. See State v. Singletary, 549 So.2d 996, 999 (Fla.1989) (“[N]o questioning of prospective jurors in a criminal case may take place outside of the presence of a trial judge. This requirement cannot be waived by anyone, including a defendant.”) (footnote omitted).

Reverse and remand for a new trial.

WARNER, C.J., STEVENSON, J., and KREEGER, JUDITH L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 739 So. 2d 745, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12375, 1999 WL 741057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

739 So. 2d 745 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Singletary
549 So. 2d 996 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)