Brown v. State

649 So. 2d 349, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 859, 1995 WL 44478
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1995·No. No. 94-2818·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Appellant’s motion was facially insufficient in that it failed to allege sufficient facts to demonstrate that his convictions arose out of a single criminal episode. Thompson v. State, 564 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

MINER, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 649 So. 2d 349, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 859, 1995 WL 44478 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

649 So. 2d 349 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
662 So. 2d 1356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)