Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brown v. State

Brown v. State

647 So. 2d 333, 1994 WL 715207
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 1994·No. 94-2067·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

647 So.2d 333 (1994)

Shaun BROWN, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 94-2067.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 28, 1994.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Linda S. Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GREEN, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the resentencing which followed our decision in Brown v. State, 617 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Because the offenses in question were committed during the same criminal transaction, it was error to impose consecutive rather than concurrent habitual offender sentences. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994). The cause is remanded *334 for correction of the sentences accordingly. The defendant need not be present.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 647 So. 2d 333, 1994 WL 715207 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

647 So. 2d 333 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
800 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Ortiz v. State
740 So. 2d 598 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Windisch v. State
709 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Suggs v. State
681 So. 2d 870 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Pearce v. Sheffey
647 So. 2d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)