Brown v. State

611 So. 2d 1376, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1720, 1993 WL 30609
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1993·No. No. 92-0630·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s numerous convictions here included one count of attempted robbery and two counts of burglary, all enhanced from second-degree to a first-degree felony by virtue of his use of a firearm. We find that the trial court erred in also convicting him for the separate offense of use of a firearm during commission of a felony because these convictions arose from the same act. Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1991). On remand the court shall strike the latter conviction and recalculate the scoresheet. We affirm in all other respects.

AFFIRMED AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., FARMER, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 611 So. 2d 1376, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1720, 1993 WL 30609 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

611 So. 2d 1376 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Szabo v. State
636 So. 2d 823 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)