Brown v. State

524 So. 2d 1032, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 94, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11705, 1987 WL 3183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 400
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 1987·No. No. BO-301·Published

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

Having reviewed each of the three issues raised by appellant, we find no error and affirm the judgment and sentence. In affirming we note that the appellant’s objections to the prosecutor’s comments made during closing argument did not include a basis asserted on appeal that the remarks were a comment on the appellant’s right to remain silent. An examination of the remarks shows that they were neither a comment on appellant’s silence nor the prosecutor’s personal assurance concerning the merits of the state’s case.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 524 So. 2d 1032, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 94, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11705, 1987 WL 3183 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

524 So. 2d 1032 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.