Brown v. State

510 So. 2d 1150, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1916, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9837
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1987·No. No. BR-288·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed on all grounds raised on appeal save one. His challenge to the legality of his sentence based on an error in scoring victim injury on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet may be properly raised by rule 3.800(a) motion. Because this motion should be so treated by the trial court, and because this asserted ground for relief is facially sufficient, denial of the motion on this ground is reversed and the cause remanded for consideration in accordance with Brown v. State, 508 So.2d 522 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED in part, and REVERSED in part.

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 510 So. 2d 1150, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1916, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9837 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

510 So. 2d 1150 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGowan v. State
586 So. 2d 1311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Johnson v. State
543 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)