Brown v. State

407 So. 2d 289, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 371 So. 2d 161
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1981·No. No. 81-231·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence is affirmed. However, in view of the fact that appellant was insolvent, the trial court erred in assessing him costs in the amount of $2.00 and requiring him to pay $10.00 to the crime compensation fund. See Brown v. State, 400 So.2d 510 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1981). The issue of whether appellant’s sentence is illegal under Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1981) is raised for the first time on appeal. Because Villery suggests that our supreme court contemplated that this issue be brought to the attention of the trial court in the first instance, we do not consider it on appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed. That portion of the order assessing court costs and requiring appellant to pay into the crime compensation fund is stricken. This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s raising the Villery issue in the trial court by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 407 So. 2d 289, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

407 So. 2d 289 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
400 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'n
396 So. 2d 1107 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)