Brown v. State
257 So. 2d 91
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 223 So. 2d 337 →
Opinion
On appeal by the defendant below from conviction of carrying a concealed firearm, it is contended the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence (a hand gun) which it is argued was the product of an illegal search of his person, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment. Those contentions having been considered by this court in the light of the record and briefs and found to be without merit, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 257 So. 2d 91 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
257 So. 2d 91 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.