Brown v. State

314 So. 2d 129, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3295
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 11, 1975·No. No. 45765·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OVERTON, Justice.

Appellant entered a plea of nolo con-tendere and was found guilty of loitering, in violation of Section 856.021, Florida Statutes. He was sentenced to time served. The appellant preserved his right to challenge the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charge on the ground that the aforesaid statute is unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution.

Subsequent to the filing of the present appeal, this Court rendered its decision in State v. Ecker, 311 So.2d 104 (Fla.1975). We there upheld the constitutionality of the subject statute but cautioned that the conduct of the defendant must reflect circumstances sufficient to establish a threat to the public safety. The sufficiency of the defendant’s conduct in the instant case was not assigned as error or briefed, and the record is not adequate for us to properly rule thereon.

The ruling of the trial court upholding the constitutionality of Section 856.021, Florida Statutes, is affirmed.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ENGLAND and DEKLE (Retired), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 314 So. 2d 129, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3295 (Fla. 1975).

314 So. 2d 129 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Strickland
337 So. 2d 959 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Fargo Van & Storage, Inc. v. Bevis
314 So. 2d 129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)