Brown v. State ex rel. Joyce

Indiana Court of Appeals

Brown v. State ex rel. Joyce

87 N.E. 157, 43 Ind. App. 297, 1909 Ind. App. LEXIS 36

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 16, 1909

DocketNo. 7,002

StatusPublished

This text of 87 N.E. 157 (Brown v. State ex rel. Joyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State ex rel. Joyce, 87 N.E. 157, 43 Ind. App. 297, 1909 Ind. App. LEXIS 36 (Ind. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only error discussed by appellants is the action of the court in overruling their motion for a new [298]*298trial. The reasons for a new trial can be determined only from a consideration of the bill of exceptions, which was not presented to the trial .judge for his approval within the time fixed. It is not, therefore, properly in the record, and, as no question is here presented, appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal must he sustained.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only error discussed by appellants is the action of the court in overruling their motion for a new [298]*298trial. The reasons for a new trial can be determined only from a consideration of the bill of exceptions, which was not presented to the trial .judge for his approval within the time fixed. It is not, therefore, properly in the record, and, as no question is here presented, appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal must he sustained.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 N.E. 157, 43 Ind. App. 297, 1909 Ind. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-ex-rel-joyce-indctapp-1909.