Brown v. State

2015 Ark. App. 7
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 14, 2015
DocketCR-14-385
StatusPublished

This text of 2015 Ark. App. 7 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 7 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 7

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-14-385

DEWAYNE BROWN Opinion Delivered January 14, 2015 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-09-809]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE JOHN N. APPELLEE FOGLEMAN, JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

Appellant Dewayne Brown entered a plea of guilty to residential burglary and theft

of property on August 28, 2009, and he was sentenced to five years’ probation. On

November 23, 2010, his probation was revoked, and he was sentenced to forty-eight

months’ probation. The State filed a petition to revoke appellant’s probation on December

28, 2012, alleging that he violated the conditions thereof by failing to pay fines, costs, and

fees; failing to report to probation; failing to pay probation fees; failing to notify the sheriff

and probation officer of current address and employment; and possessing and using marijuana

and cocaine. After a hearing, the trial court found that appellant had violated the conditions

of his probation by failing to report to his probation officer as directed and sentenced him

to five years in the Arkansas Department of Correction.

Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, stating that there is no merit Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 7

to an appeal. The motion is accompanied by an abstract and addendum of the proceedings

below and a brief in which counsel explains why there is nothing in the record that would

support an appeal. The court’s decision to revoke was the only adverse ruling. The clerk of

this court served appellant with a copy of counsel’s brief and notified him of his right to file

a pro se statement of points for reversal within thirty days. Appellant has filed no pro se

points.

From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, we find compliance with

Rule 4-3(k) and that there is no merit to an appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the order of

revocation and grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Affirmed; motion granted.

GLOVER and WHITEAKER, JJ., agree.

C. Brian Williams, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. App. 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-arkctapp-2015.