Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Brown v. State

913 S.W.2d 792, 323 Ark. 319, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 72

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 5, 1996

DocketCR 96-73

StatusPublished

This text of 913 S.W.2d 792 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 913 S.W.2d 792, 323 Ark. 319, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 72 (Ark. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Damion Jemon Brown, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Chris Tarver, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Damion Jemon Brown, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Chris Tarver, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

913 S.W.2d 792, 323 Ark. 319, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-ark-1996.