Brown v. State

5 So. 2d 647, 30 Ala. App. 326, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Ala. App. 27
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 1941·No. 8 Div. 163.·Published

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was tried before the court sitting without a jury on an affidavit charging that he “did buy sell or have in possession illegally * * * prohibited liquors.” He was found guilty, and brings this appeal.

There is not much to be said.

His demurrers to the affidavit were properly overruled. Jinright v. State, 220 Ala. 268, 125 So. 606.

In the first place, there was no objection interposed to the question calling for the testimony as' to what appellant said at the time and place where the whiskey was found. But if there had been, it appears that whatever he may have there said would have been a part of the res gestae, and admissible into the evidence. Vincent v. State, 22 Ala.App. 172, 113 So. 643.

We observe no error, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 5 So. 2d 647, 30 Ala. App. 326, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 171 (Ala. Ct. App. 1941).

5 So. 2d 647 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vincent v. State
113 So. 643 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)
Jinright v. State
125 So. 606 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)