Brown v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Brown v. State

126 So. 183, 23 Ala. App. 404, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 40

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 11, 1930

Docket7 Div. 587.

StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 183 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 126 So. 183, 23 Ala. App. 404, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 40 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence was in conflict, and hence all charges requiring affirmative action by the jury were properly refused.

Other charges asserting correct propositions of law were covered by the court in his oral charge.

The defendant may not be guilty, but two witnesses testified to the facts, and the jury, seeing them and hearing them, believed their story, and the trial judge on motion also believed what they testified to. There is no reason to say that the judge committed error in refusing the motion for new trial.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI