Brown v. Standard Oil Co.

N.D. Alabama

Brown v. Standard Oil Co.

52 F. Supp. 1022, 1943 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2058

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama

DecidedOctober 11, 1943

DocketNo. 5464

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 F. Supp. 1022 (Brown v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Standard Oil Co., 52 F. Supp. 1022, 1943 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2058 (N.D. Ala. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

MULLINS, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the oral and written evidence introduced at the hearing the court finds that, although some sales were made on October 2, 1943, as averred in the complaint and answer, the defendant, in view of all the circumstances and conditions set forth in the evidence, made a reasonable effort in good faith to comply with the law and the regulations involved and that it did not wilfully or intentionally fail to comply therewith. In the opinion of the court the evidence does not justify a finding that the defendant will violate the statute or the regulations involved if injunctive relief is not granted.

Conclusions of Law.

The cause having been submitted by the parties upon the complaint, the answer, and the oral and documentary evidence introduced at the hearing, upon both the prayer for a temporary injunction and the prayer for a permanent injunction, the court finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive relief, temporary or permanent, as prayed for in the complaint; and accordingly a judgment denying the relief sought and dismissing the complaint will be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MULLINS, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the oral and written evidence introduced at the hearing the court finds that, although some sales were made on October 2, 1943, as averred in the complaint and answer, the defendant, in view of all the circumstances and conditions set forth in the evidence, made a reasonable effort in good faith to comply with the law and the regulations involved and that it did not wilfully or intentionally fail to comply therewith. In the opinion of the court the evidence does not justify a finding that the defendant will violate the statute or the regulations involved if injunctive relief is not granted.

Conclusions of Law.

The cause having been submitted by the parties upon the complaint, the answer, and the oral and documentary evidence introduced at the hearing, upon both the prayer for a temporary injunction and the prayer for a permanent injunction, the court finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive relief, temporary or permanent, as prayed for in the complaint; and accordingly a judgment denying the relief sought and dismissing the complaint will be entered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 F. Supp. 1022, 1943 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-standard-oil-co-alnd-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack