Brown v. Spaulding

7 A. 381, 63 N.H. 622
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

It does not appear that tbe plaintiff’s original cause of action was extinguished by bis subsequent prospective agreement.

Case discharged.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Spaulding, 7 A. 381, 63 N.H. 622 (N.H. 1885).

7 A. 381 (Brown v. Spaulding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 Peoples
250 S.E.2d 890 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)