Brown v. South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. South Carolina

589 F. App'x 190

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 2015

DocketNo. 14-2155

StatusPublished

This text of 589 F. App'x 190 (Brown v. South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. South Carolina, 589 F. App'x 190 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Brown appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his discrimination complaint against the State of South Carolina as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. South. Carolina, No. 3:13-cv-02983-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Brown appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his discrimination complaint against the State of South Carolina as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. South. Carolina, No. 3:13-cv-02983-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

589 F. App'x 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-south-carolina-ca4-2015.