Brown v. Solomon
This text of Brown v. Solomon (Brown v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ : ERIN BROWN, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 11-1846 (HHK) : ALAN S. SOLOMON, : : Defendant. : ___________________________________ :
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The defendant filed a motion to dismiss [Dkt. #3] on December 14, 2011. In its
December 20, 2011 Order, the Court advised the plaintiff, among other things, of her obligation
to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly warned the
plaintiff that, if she failed to file her opposition by January 13, 2012, the Court would treat the
motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor requested
additional time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will treat the defendant’s motion as conceded.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH United States District Judge DATE: January 30, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Solomon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-solomon-dcd-2012.