BROWN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

District Court, D. Maine·Decided February 28, 2024·No. 1:22-cv-00223·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

RUSSELL B.,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil No.: 1:22-cv-00223-LEW MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER Pursuant to the power of this Court to award fees and expenses to a prevailing party other than the United States incurred by that party in a civil action against the United States, including proceedings for judicial review of agency action, under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), and in light of this Court’s Order and Judgment, remanding this case to the Defendant Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Social Security Administration shall pay attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,500.00 in full satisfaction of any and all attorney’s fee, expense, and cost claims Plaintiff may have in this case under the Equal Access to Justice Act. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (ECF No. 24) is DENIED as MOOT. Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), these attorney fees and expenses are payable to Plaintiff as the prevailing party and are subject to offset through the Treasury Department’s Offset Program to satisfy any pre-existing debt Plaintiff may owe to the government. If, after the entry of this Order, the Commissioner de- termines that Plaintiff owes no debt to the government that would subject this award of attor- ney’s fees and expenses to offset, the Commissioner may honor Plaintiff’s signed assignment of EAJA fees providing for payment of the subject fees to Plaintiff’s counsel, rather than to Plain- tiff. If, however, Plaintiff is discovered to owe the government any debt subject to offset, the Commissioner shall pay any attorney’s fees and expenses remaining after such offset to Plaintiff

rather than to counsel. Dated this 28th day of February, 2024. /s/ Lance E. Walker UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, (D. Me. 2024).

BROWN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER (BROWN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)