Brown v. Smyth

4 Del. 204
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 1, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Del. 204 (Brown v. Smyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Smyth, 4 Del. 204 (Del. Ct. App. 1844).

Opinion

Court.

—The motion is to amend the judgment against Smyth by [206]*206adding the name of Wm. J. Reader. The- judgment is a several judgment against Smyth, on a joint warrant to confess judgment against Reader and Smyth. The court has no authority to authorize a judgment different from the power of attorney; and the entry of a judgment different from the power is unauthorized, and cannot in any form be cured. The application to amend by inserting a new defendant is an application after judgment, not merely to amend, but to make a judgment, including the making new parties. Such an» amendment cannot be allowed.

Gray, for the motion. Wales and Chandler, contra.

Amendment refused; and judgment stricken out.

The parties now compromised; and the rule was made absoluto for the payment of the balance in court to the defendant, Smyth..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Del. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-smyth-delsuperct-1844.